Posted in Editing & Critiquing, General Writing, tagged 31 Days to Build a Better Blog, April Hamilton, budget, criticism, critique, Critters, Darren Rowse, editing, Editing & Critiquing, POD, POD People, Problogger, sandwich method, writing on July 24, 2010|
5 Comments »
As I work my way through Darren Rowse’s 31 Days to Build a Better Blog, I decided to take on his earlier challenge to write a post with seven links. Since this post was originally going to be about critiquing or editing, I went with seven links on that subject. Without further ado, here they are:
- Critters Makes for Better Writing — Don’t let the title fool you. It’s not about household pets. This post about finding someone to give you honest feedback on your fiction.
- Sandwich Critiquing — this is perhaps my favorite post, giving you a helpful technique to use when you are asked to critique someone else’s not-so-perfect manuscript.
- Editing With or Without a Budget — more helpful tips on how to use money to learn how to edit
- Blogosphere Trends + Handling High Word Counts — this is a great guest post on Problogger by Kimberly Turner on how to trim the fat in your writing.
- When Editing & Critiquing, Check Your Personal Opinions At The Door — the title says it all. A great post by April Hamilton of Indie Author.
- POD People Scares Me — I love this title, but that’s not the only reason I chose it. Find out why editing is possibly the most important thing you can do before sending your manuscript to the publisher or POD (print-on-demand) company.
- The Art of Critiquing — receiving criticism is difficult, especially when the person giving it doesn’t give you helpful details you can actually use to improve your work. This post will get you thinking of specifics to address when giving criticism to someone else.
Editing your work, giving and receiving criticism, it’s all part of the process. Knowing how to do it makes it all the easier to move on down The Road to Writing.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Editing & Critiquing, tagged Absolute Write, critique, critiquing group, Critters, Editing & Critiquing, Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing, writer's baby, writers, writing on February 27, 2010|
4 Comments »
It’s come to my attention that there are a lot of us who don’t have a clue how to honestly critique. We can tell you we like your story (or hate it), but we leave out the most important part — the why.
Critiquing isn’t just about misspellings and bad punctuation. It’s about understandability, what makes a story something you just can’t put down. Or, as Kelly Hart put it in her post Critiquing, “[I]t is about trying to help the story creator reach the full potential for that story.” She goes on to remind us that each story is the writer’s “baby” and “[f]or this reason you should try to be as diplomatic as possible, nobody likes to be told bad things about their baby.” (And I can say that’s true from both the mother’s and writer’s POV)
One way to bone up on the hows of critiquing is to just do it. Receiving critiques and critiquing others’ works makes a writer a better writer because it “improves your own editing eye,” according to blogger Penny in her post
The Art of Critiquing, Pt. 1. I have to agree with that. As I’ve read and edited others’ works, I’ve noticed problems in my own writing.
Of course, getting critiques (honest ones, especially) can be difficult. I’ve mentioned Critters as a place to find other authors willing to give good criticism, but I recently read about another called Absolute Write. After reading the Newbie section I think it sounds like a great place, so long as you can handle a little heat. Apparently there have been some, as the moderator put it, knock-down-drag-out arguments on things as silly as the appropriate use of serial commas.
Of course, my suggestion before putting your work out there for criticism, is to edit it at least once yourself. Track down as many of those niggly little misspellings and punctuation errors as you can. And don’t forget about grammar. While in some cases grammar rules can be bent, it’s best not to break them without at least knowing them. For that I would recommend a fantastic little book called Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing.
Regardless of where you find your critics (or where they find you ;)) try to keep in mind what you need to improve your writing, then reach out to your fellow traveler to give the same in return on The Road to Writing.
Read Full Post »
Posted in Editing & Critiquing, General Writing, tagged critique, critiquing group, Critters, editing, Editing & Critiquing, Karen Traviss, novel critiqued, print-on-demand, rewriting, Star Wars, SW novel, writers, writing, writing advice on November 21, 2009|
4 Comments »
My husband is a big Star Wars fan. He watches all six movies often, though there’s a couple he watches more often than the rest. He collects the action figures (never call them toys to a “true” collector). He rushes to the video store that sells the comic books the same day they call him to let him know his comic is in. And everytime a new SW novel appears in print he combs the bookstores (ranting about it being released in hard back first and having to wait a year or more for its release in paper back, but that’s another story for another blog). All of this means that when he found his favorite SW author’s web site he, of course, emailed a link to the site to me.
Usually I look at these “helpful” links others send me with half-hearted attention, but the fact that he raves about this author’s writing made me curious. My initial reaction to Karen Traviss’ web site was, if possible, even more curiousity because the first page link she has is to something called Critters. (My husband, being the wonderfully oblivious man he is, assumed the author was talking about her pets or some such thing.) After looking at her other page links, which all had to do with how to be a better writer, I figured it had to have something to do with writing.
I haven’t been so surprised at being right in a long time. It turns out that Critters is a group of writers from novice to pro who critique each others’ work. (Hence the clever name.) It’s a great idea. The only catch is that all members are required to submit a minimum of one critique per week. The good news is that there are ways to get ahead in critiquing and ways to catch up. The benefits of having your work honestly, and tactfully, critiqued before it hits the publishers desk or you’ve already submitted it to a POD (print-on-demand) company far outweigh the commitment in time and energy spent doing a critique a week.
The best part is that you can have your complete novel critiqued as well as smaller works. There are special provisions for entire novels and a way to get your work bumped up to the top for critique if you just don’t have the time to wait an entire month.
While it would be nice to be able to write the perfect story from the first word, a good writer knows that editing and rewriting are a must in the craft. Having your work critiqued by others who have no reason to stroke your ego, as family and friends do, makes the process that much better (though no less painful). Thanks to authors like Karen Traviss, who are willing to give new and emerging writers advice, and to fellow writers like those on Critters, every would-be author has a better chance at success on The Road to Writing.
Read Full Post »